Knot on the Q, T, or 3R's.
Sow it is one word. Sew me! [?]
Nor Fore-P's or No Peas ? !
(or sub sets: A
Penchant for Leaning)
[Or 3 L*'s... dot, dot, dot ]
* ba ba wa wa ?
[Sew we ?!]
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts with label Edutainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Edutainment. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Certain Sources...
(now there is a sticky wicket)...
(like "some people")...
My bottom line or actually my sub-heading(un-Tan-Gent-Ed) was that some people cannot possibly read all that they pass on, but it could be just me. ( update** ) Labels do not do justice, but again that is probably me too. Bloggers*** should be called something other than journalists, infotainment may be the ticket. But again my point is that the devil is in the details, sometimes between the lines, and certainly not absolute. In some cases, not certain, full reads are not required.
BTW: It was not my intent to cast aspersions on the prior post with my photo. But it is relevant(bull) and an appropriate image(below) that I cannot even return (1) to all I might like to read (2) or reference. (3)
* (bracketed inserts in the flow of conversation and reading the heading)
** approximate timing of update
*** leaving mainstream and cable networks aside

(1) "two points reference* a line
(2) "This is one to savor"
(3) NBC / Text
[I have viewed the 2nd inaugural speech, but it bears review and revisiting.]
[Lunch hour stop at The Cycle, finds Hillary testifying in Congress. Bearing in mind who should sack certain someones. ]
(like "some people")...
...or Filters need Filtering.*
But my point of departure is the cutting word. "Certain" itself is parsed as I have bracketed.My bottom line or actually my sub-heading(un-Tan-Gent-Ed) was that some people cannot possibly read all that they pass on, but it could be just me. ( update** ) Labels do not do justice, but again that is probably me too. Bloggers*** should be called something other than journalists, infotainment may be the ticket. But again my point is that the devil is in the details, sometimes between the lines, and certainly not absolute. In some cases, not certain, full reads are not required.
BTW: It was not my intent to cast aspersions on the prior post with my photo. But it is relevant(bull) and an appropriate image(below) that I cannot even return (1) to all I might like to read (2) or reference. (3)
* (bracketed inserts in the flow of conversation and reading the heading)
** approximate timing of update
*** leaving mainstream and cable networks aside

(1) "two points reference* a line
(2) "This is one to savor"
(3) NBC / Text
[I have viewed the 2nd inaugural speech, but it bears review and revisiting.]
[Lunch hour stop at The Cycle, finds Hillary testifying in Congress. Bearing in mind who should sack certain someones. ]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)